Claims

Delphi experts reached 80% or higher consensus on all major CSM-SU components

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A two-round Delphi study with ten field experts established consensus at 80% or higher on all major components of the CSM-SU model. → Keravnos 2025

Evidence

Keravnos 2025

Keravnos, N., & Orphanos, S. (2025). Utilisation of SWOT analysis for decision-making in educational contexts. European Journal of Educational Management, 8(4), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.8.4.219

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

Two-round Delphi validation with 10 Cypriot field experts (six senior principals, two inspectors, two academics). Round 2 re-evaluation reported "consensus established at 80% or higher" on all major model elements; no effect size is printed.

"Experts indicated their level of agreement with key components of the model, with consensus established at 80% or higher. All major elements met this criterion, indicating both conceptual robustness and practical feasibility within educational settings."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id delphi-consensus-csm-su-components
title Delphi experts reached 80% or higher consensus on all major CSM-SU components
description Delphi experts reached 80% or higher consensus on all major CSM-SU components
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — keravnos-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.