Claims

The study sample was predominantly male and drawn mostly from public special education institutes in Islamabad

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 72.8% of the 125 sampled children were male and 27.2% female. → Malik 2018 q2 i? 54.4% attended public sector institutes and about 43% private setups. → Malik 2018 (2)

Evidence

Malik 2018

Malik, S., Abd Manaf, U. K., Ahmad, N. A., & Ismail, M. (2018). Orientation and Mobility Training in Special Education Curriculum for Social Adjustment Problems of Visually Impaired Children in Pakistan. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11213a

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Descriptive frequency tabulation of the convenience sample of 125 visually impaired children (91 male, 34 female, ages 5-15). The article reports "72.8 % of male and 27.2 female" and offers the attendance imbalance as an observation, not a tested result.

"Children consisting of 72.8 % of male and 27.2 female were part of the research study, also reflecting a notion that female students coming to institutes with visual impairment is far less than their male counterparts."

Malik 2018 (2)

Malik, S., Abd Manaf, U. K., Ahmad, N. A., & Ismail, M. (2018). Orientation and Mobility Training in Special Education Curriculum for Social Adjustment Problems of Visually Impaired Children in Pakistan. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11213a

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Frequency tabulation of institute type for the same sample: 68 public and 54 private students. The authors suggest this may indicate "the scarcity of private setups or the non -affordability of pare nts", an untested interpretation.

"54.4 % of the children were students at public sector, educational institutes, where about 43% were studying in private setups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.