The SAW model shows construct validity and good correlation (0.87) between simulated and operating-room laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair performance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Mean GOALS-IH scores were lower for novices (22.7) than experts (32.3) on the SAW model, suggesting construct validity. → Pelly T. 2021
q2 i? GOALS-IH performance on the SAW model correlated with operating-room performance (0.87) across 14 surgeons. → Pelly T. 2021 (2)
Evidence¶
Pelly T. 2021¶
Pelly T., Vance-Daniel J., Linder C. (2021). Characteristics of laparoscopic and open hernia repair simulation models: a systematic review. Hernia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251686/
q2 · i? · review · r2
Validation study of the GOALS-IH assessment tool using the Surgical Abdominal Wall (SAW) box trainer; the review reports novices scored 22.7 versus experts' 32.3, "suggesting construct validity". No standardised effect size is printed.
"The mean GOALS-IH score was lower for novices (22.7) than for experts (32.3), suggesting construct validity."
Pelly T. 2021 (2)¶
Pelly T., Vance-Daniel J., Linder C. (2021). Characteristics of laparoscopic and open hernia repair simulation models: a systematic review. Hernia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251686/
q2 · i? · review · r2
Correlational study assessing 14 surgeons with the GOALS-IH tool on the SAW model and on actual patients; the review reports "good correlation (0.87) between performance in the simulator and the operating room". Novice subgroup correlation did not reach statistical significance.
"There was good correlation (0.87) between performance in the simulator and the operating room, although it should be noted that novice surgeons achieved lower scores in the operating room, and the study was not able to reach statistical significance in this group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Open hernia repair simulation models lack evidence of educational impact, with fewer validity assessments than laparoscopic models — related
- Simulation-based training with the McGill Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Simulator improved operating-room GOALS-GH scores by a mean of 3.4 points in a randomised trial — related
- A simulation-based mastery-learning curriculum using the Guildford MATTU TEP model produced faster TEP repair, higher GOALS scores and fewer complications than standard apprenticeship training — related
- A moulded rubber TEP box trainer programme produced higher composite operative scores (P = 0.01) and suggested transfer of skills to real operations — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.