Claims

Simulation-based training with the McGill Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Simulator improved operating-room GOALS-GH scores by a mean of 3.4 points in a randomised trial

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Residents randomised to simulation-based training showed statistically significant improvement in GOALS-GH scores by a mean of 3.4 points at operating-room assessment, while the control group did not. → Pelly T. 2021

Evidence

Pelly T. 2021

Pelly T., Vance-Daniel J., Linder C. (2021). Characteristics of laparoscopic and open hernia repair simulation models: a systematic review. Hernia. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251686/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Randomised controlled trial in which 14 surgical residents were assigned to a simulation-based curriculum or control group and assessed with the GOALS-GH tool; the review reports "statistically significant improvement in GOALS-GH scores by a mean of 3.4 points". No effect size is printed.

"On operating room assessment after 15 days, the simulation-based group was found to have statistically significant improvement in GOALS-GH scores by a mean of 3.4 points, where the control group did not."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.