Fidelity to SBAR moderates communication clarity improvements: classroom studies show higher fidelity and larger gains than clinical-setting studies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Classroom-based studies achieved SBAR fidelity of 71–87% with moderate to considerable clarity improvements, while clinical-setting studies showed fidelity of 53–83% with no or only moderate improvements. → Yun Jungmi 2023

Evidence¶

Yun Jungmi 2023¶

Yun Jungmi, Lee Yun Ji, Kang Kyoungrim, Park Jongmin. (2023). Effectiveness of SBAR-based simulation programs for nursing students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04495-8

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative review discussion citing prior studies of SBAR fidelity. The review reports "classroom-based studies achieved levels of fidelity to SBAR ranging from 71–87%" with moderate to considerable clarity improvements, attributing the contrast to cited prior work rather than computing it itself.

"Classroom-based studies achieved levels of fidelity to SBAR ranging from 71–87% and reported moderate to considerable improvements in the clarity of communication"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• SBAR-based simulation programs produce significant improvements in communication clarity for nursing students in six of twelve reviewed studies — related
• Structured communication tools such as SBAR incorporated into simulation are associated with improved team coordination and information transfer — related
• Simulation-based training is associated with improved patient safety-related skills and knowledge in undergraduate nursing students — related