Claims

SBAR-based simulation programs produce significant improvements in communication clarity for nursing students in six of twelve reviewed studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Six of the 12 included studies produced significant results in favor of SBAR-based simulation for communication clarity. → Yun Jungmi 2023

Evidence

Yun Jungmi 2023

Yun Jungmi, Lee Yun Ji, Kang Kyoungrim, Park Jongmin. (2023). Effectiveness of SBAR-based simulation programs for nursing students: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04495-8

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review following PRISMA with PROSPERO registration, analyzing 12 studies (3 RCTs, 9 quasi-experimental) using the framework approach with narrative summary. The review reports that "six out of 12 studies produced significant results in favor of SBAR-based simulation in terms of communication clarity."

"The results of six out of 12 studies produced significant results in favor of SBAR-based simulation in terms of communication clarity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.