Claims

Simulation-based education combined with workflow redesign improved ICU nurses' delirium-assessment documentation rates on day and night shifts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After simulation-based education, ICU nursing documentation of delirium screening rose from 40% to 93% on day shifts and from 27% to 71% on night shifts following documentation changes. → EL Hussein Mohamed Toufic 2026

Evidence

EL Hussein Mohamed Toufic 2026

EL Hussein Mohamed Toufic, Sheehan Dawson S., Hirst Sandra. (2026). Simulation‐Based Education to Support Nurses' Critical Thinking in Delirium Recognition: A Scoping Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70640

q2 · i? · design · r2

This was a quality-improvement project using Lean Six Sigma with PDSA cycles in an urban tertiary-care ICU, tracking nursing documentation of delirium screening per 12-h shift via the EHR. Documentation rose "from 40% to 93% on day shifts and 27% to 71% on night shifts, following SBE and workflow redesign"; the review reports these as descriptive percentages, with no effect size.

"Aparanji et al. (2018) recorded substantial improvements in ICU delirium‐assessment documentation, from 40% to 93% on day shifts and 27% to 71% on night shifts, following SBE and workflow redesign."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.