Claims

SBI produces significantly more growth in proportional problem solving over time than business-as-usual instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q4
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? An ancillary longitudinal analysis of PPS data showed the SBI group demonstrated significantly more growth in proportional problem solving than controls. → Jitendra 2015

Evidence

Jitendra 2015

Jitendra, A. K., Harwell, M. R., Dupuis, D. N., Karl, S. R., Lein, A. E., Simonson, G., & Slater, S. C. (2015). Effects of a research-based intervention to improve seventh-grade students’ proportional problem solving: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000039

q4 · i? · causal · r3

An ancillary analysis of PPS longitudinal data explored "student change over time and whether such change was impacted by the treatment", finding the SBI group "showed significantly more growth in proportional problem solving" than the control group.

"also showed significantly more growth in proportional problem solving"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.