Claims

SBI effects on proportional problem solving are maintained on a delayed posttest administered 9 weeks after intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q4
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? SBI students maintained their advantage over control students on the PPS delayed posttest given 9 weeks after the intervention ended. → Jitendra 2015

Evidence

Jitendra 2015

Jitendra, A. K., Harwell, M. R., Dupuis, D. N., Karl, S. R., Lein, A. E., Simonson, G., & Slater, S. C. (2015). Effects of a research-based intervention to improve seventh-grade students’ proportional problem solving: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000039

q4 · i? · causal · r3

The abstract reports that "the SBI group scored on average significantly higher than the control group on the posttest and retention test (9 weeks later)". The delayed posttest ICC was .18 (p < .001), with 18% of variance between classrooms.

"the SBI group scored on average significantly higher than the control group on the posttest and retention test (9 weeks later) and also showed significantly more growth in proportional problem solving"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.