Claims

Simulation-based learning improves theoretical knowledge scores in endocrinology education compared with non-simulation-based learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Across 17 RCTs (811 SBL vs 830 NSBL subjects), SBL showed a significant advantage in theoretical knowledge (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.68–1.32, P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%). → Wu Zeyu 2024

Evidence

Wu Zeyu 2024

Wu Zeyu, Huang Yiling, Lyu Ling, Huang Yu, Ping Fan. (2024). The efficacy of simulation-based learning versus non-simulation-based learning in endocrinology education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06010-z

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials comparing SBL with NSBL in endocrinology education, pooled in Review Manager 5.4. The pooled estimate showed "a significant advantage of SBL over NSBL" with SMD = 1.00 (95% CI 0.68–1.32) and high heterogeneity (I2 = 89%).

"Seventeen studies [14, 16–19, 21–31, 33] reported test scores of theoretical knowledge (811 subjects in the SBL cohort and 830 subjects in the NSBL cohort), demonstrating a significant advantage of SBL over NSBL (SMD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.68–1.32, P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.