Claims

Simulation-based learning consistently improves nursing students' knowledge and skills acquisition across diverse designs and simulation topics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across 33 studies of heterogeneous design, SBL showed a steady and credible agreement of enhancing both knowledge and skills of nursing students. → Alharbi 2024

Evidence

Alharbi 2024

Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R. F., McClure, J. D., & Miller, W. H. (2024). The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students’ knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z

q3 · i? · review · r2

Systematic review narrative synthesis of 33 studies (15 RCTs, 18 quasi-experimental; 3,670 participants) on CPR/life-support, critical care and decision-making skills. The review reports "a steady and credible agreement" that SBL enhances knowledge and skills, with effects observed in both randomised and non-randomised designs.

"Despite the diversity in simulation environments, methodologies, and outcomes which encompassed a notable level of heterogeneity among the studies included, there was a steady and credible agreement suggesting that SBL is a potent method for enhancing both knowledge and skills of nursing students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.