Claims

Simulation-based medical education improves knowledge-based performance of undergraduate medical students as an adjunct to existing curricula

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? All included studies reported a performance benefit to students associated with simulation training across medical and surgical specialities. → McInerney Niall 2022

Evidence

McInerney Niall 2022

McInerney Niall, Nally D., Khan M.F., Heneghan H., Cahill R.A. (2022). Performance effects of simulation training for medical students – a systematic review. GMS Journal for Medical Education. https://www.egms.de/en/journals/zma/2022-39/zma001572.shtml

q3 · i? · review · r2

Narrative systematic review per PRISMA of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed (2010–2020); nineteen articles including nine randomised trials concerning 2459 students (median 79/study) were selected. The review reports that "All groups reported a performance benefit to students associated with simulation training." No pooled effect size was computed because meta-analysis was prohibited by heterogeneity.

"All groups reported a performance benefit to students associated with simulation training. Simulation training was shown to have a positive effect when used across a broad range of medical and surgical specialities, in acute and non-acute scenarios."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.