Claims

Scaffolded student teachers were more effective in searching for information for their presentation, while the unscaffolded group had difficulties finding relevant information

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a six-hour medicine education intervention, the scaffolded group (Google Sites case and presentation templates) was quite effective in searching for information for their presentation, whereas the unscaffolded group (Word documents only) had difficulties finding relevant information. → Sirpa Kärkkäinen 2014

Evidence

Sirpa Kärkkäinen 2014

Sirpa Kärkkäinen, Jari Kukkonen and Tuula Keinonen. (2014). Scaffolding in a Medicine Education Intervention for Student Teachers Based on the PROFILES Three Stage Model. ceps Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129505

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Qualitative discourse analysis of recorded discussions from two groups of three primary school teacher students during the 'Flu' intervention; the article reports the scaffolded group was "quite effective in searching for information" while the unscaffolded group had difficulties. No effect size is printed.

"However, the scaffolded group is quite effective in searching for information for their presentation, whereas the unscaffolded group has difficulties in finding relevant information."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.