Self- and peer-assessment showed no big differences between groups except a more intensive inquiry process in the scaffolded group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In self- and peer assessment of the Three Stage Model, there were no big differences between the groups, though the scaffolded group rated its inquiry process (searching for information) very good while the unscaffolded group rated it good. → Sirpa Kärkkäinen 2014
Evidence¶
Sirpa Kärkkäinen 2014¶
Sirpa Kärkkäinen, Jari Kukkonen and Tuula Keinonen. (2014). Scaffolding in a Medicine Education Intervention for Student Teachers Based on the PROFILES Three Stage Model. ceps Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129505
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Qualitative analysis of the student teachers' self-assessment and peer assessment after their oral presentations, summarised in Table 4 (+++ = very good, ++ = good). The scaffolded group's inquiry process was rated +++ versus ++. No effect size is printed.
"In this respect, there were no big differences between the groups. The scaffolded group’s inquiry process was more intensive, because they used the given websites (not Google); they also highlighted the reliability of the websites in their presentation and in the Decision-making Stage, and included arguments and multiple decisions for treatment suggestions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Scaffolded and unscaffolded groups showed few differences in knowledge of flu symptoms, home resources and self-care medicines during the Inquiry Stage — related
- Scaffolded student teachers were more effective in searching for information for their presentation, while the unscaffolded group had difficulties finding relevant information — related
- The scaffolded group gave more argumentation concerning flu treatment and prevention suggestions in the Decision-making Stage — related
- Both scaffolded and unscaffolded groups discussed and rated the reliability of the three given websites in the same way — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.