The five-dimension structure and scale were validated with 308 graduate students, showing acceptable reliability and validity¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with 308 graduate students validated the five first-order dimensions and 15 second-order indicators, with the scale demonstrating acceptable reliability and validity. → Zhi Y 2026
Evidence¶
Zhi Y 2026¶
Zhi Y, Yang W and Huang K (2026) Modeling and measuring graduate students' generative AI literacy: a study based on Marzano's taxonomy. Front. Psychol. 17:1883978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1883978
q3 · i? · design · r2
Quantitative validation study reported in the abstract: a questionnaire survey of 308 graduate students analyzed with exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability and validity tests confirmed the structure identified qualitatively. No specific fit indices or coefficients are quoted in the available text.
"Five first-order dimensions and 15 s-order indicators were identified and validated through grounded theory analysis and questionnaire testing, with the scale demonstrating acceptable reliability and validity."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Grounded theory analysis of professor interviews identifies five functional domains of graduate students' generative AI literacy — related
- The five dimensions of the developed thinking styles scale show structural validity via confirmatory factor analysis — related
- Reliability of the thinking styles scale ranges from .722 to .913 across its five dimensions — related
- Exploratory factor analysis supports a five-factor GAA-LS structure explaining 67.82% of variance — related
- The GAA-LS shows satisfactory-to-strong internal consistency and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
scale-validation-308-graduate-students |
title |
The five-dimension structure and scale were validated with 308 graduate students, showing acceptable reliability and validity |
description |
The five-dimension structure and scale were validated with 308 graduate students, showing acceptable reliability and validity |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zhi-y-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.