School-age children and adolescents distinguish competitive from cooperative opponents, with cooperation peaking in late childhood¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i1–i3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Across grades 1-12, children cooperated more with the high-competitive than the low-competitive opponent after repeated interaction. → Zhang 2026
q3 i3 Cooperation rates were lowest in grades 1-2 and highest in grades 4-5, declining toward adolescence. → Zhang 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Zhang 2026¶
Zhang, R., Zhang, L., Hao, X.-M., Dreher, J.-C., & Qu, C. (2026). Learning to adaptively cooperate through social interactions during childhood and adolescence. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00423-9
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Mixed ANOVA on cooperation rates for 146 participants aged 6-17: Opponent × Block interaction was significant (ηp² = 0.02), with higher cooperation toward HCO in blocks 2-5 but not block 1. There was also a significant Opponent main effect (d = -0.35, p < .001).
"We found a significant Opponent × Block interaction, F (3.75, 532.48) = 2.84, p = .027, 𝜂𝑝2 = 0.02."
Zhang 2026 (2)¶
Zhang, R., Zhang, L., Hao, X.-M., Dreher, J.-C., & Qu, C. (2026). Learning to adaptively cooperate through social interactions during childhood and adolescence. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00423-9
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Grade main effect (ηp² = 0.17): grades 1-2 showed lower cooperation than grades 4-5 (d = -0.81, p < .001), grades 7-9 (d = -0.67) and grades 10-12 (d = -0.46, p = .037). No Grade × Opponent × Block interaction (p = .807), so opponent differentiation was similar across grades.
"There were significant main effects of Opponent F (1, 568) = 32.39, p < .001, 𝜂𝑝 2 = 0.18, and Grade F (3, 142) = 10.19, p < .001, 𝜂𝑝 2 = 0.17."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learning-rate asymmetries between opponent types reverse across grade groups, with a non-monotonic age trend — related
- Preschoolers gradually learn to cooperate more with high-competitive than low-competitive opponents in the Chicken game — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Preschoolers' Chicken game choices are best explained by reward-based learning with a higher learning rate for the competitive opponent — related
- Model support shifts from reward-based learning in early primary school to belief-based opponent tracking from grades 4-5 onward — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
school-age-opponent-differentiation-cooperation-peak |
title |
School-age children and adolescents distinguish competitive from cooperative opponents, with cooperation peaking in late childhood |
description |
School-age children and adolescents distinguish competitive from cooperative opponents, with cooperation peaking in late childhood |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — zhang-2026, zhang-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.