Science teachers show higher TCK understanding levels than math teachers in the ML4STEM study.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Seven of nine science teachers scored above the good TCK level, while only three of eight math teachers did. → Jingwan Tang 2023

Evidence¶

Jingwan Tang 2023¶

Jingwan Tang, Xiaofei Zhou, Xiaoyu Wan, Michael Daley, Zhen Bai. (2023). ML4STEM Professional Development Program: Enriching K-12 STEM Teaching with Machine Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00292-4

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive subgroup comparison of TCK quality ratings from the same idea-rating study; the article reports "Seven out of 9 science teachers were above the good understanding, while only 3 out of 8 math teachers achieved that level." No statistical test or effect size is printed for this contrast.

"Seven out of 9 science teachers were above the good understanding, while only 3 out of 8 math teachers achieved that level."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Most participating teachers produce ML-empowered scientific discovery teaching ideas of excellent, good, or fair quality after the TaL session. — related
• Teachers' post-TaL technology knowledge is not significantly associated with their technology content knowledge. — related