Claims

Teachers' post-TaL technology knowledge is not significantly associated with their technology content knowledge.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A Spearman correlation between post TK scores and TCK understanding levels was not statistically significant. → Jingwan Tang 2023

Evidence

Jingwan Tang 2023

Jingwan Tang, Xiaofei Zhou, Xiaoyu Wan, Michael Daley, Zhen Bai. (2023). ML4STEM Professional Development Program: Enriching K-12 STEM Teaching with Machine Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00292-4

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Secondary correlational analysis of the same 18-teacher dataset, relating post-test TK scores to TCK quality levels. The article reports the association "was not statistically significant ( p = .309)"; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.

"However, according to a Spearman correlation test, the association between the post TK and TCK was not statistically significant ( p = .309)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tk-tck-correlation-null
title Teachers' post-TaL technology knowledge is not significantly associated with their technology content knowledge.
description Teachers' post-TaL technology knowledge is not significantly associated with their technology content knowledge.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jingwan-tang-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.