Claims

The SCL model improves skill scores compared to LBL in medical education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? SCL significantly improves skill scores compared to LBL (MD 5.37, 95% CI 3.53–7.21). → Lou Jicheng 2025

Evidence

Lou Jicheng 2025

Lou Jicheng, Guo Feng. (2025). Comparing the seminar-case learning and lecture-based learning models in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07041-w

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (562 students) reporting skill scores. Found SCL "associated with higher skill scores" compared to LBL, with a weighted mean difference of "MD 5.37".

"Compared with the LBL model, the SCL model was associated with higher skill scores (MD 5.37, 95% CI 3.53–7.21; p < 0.00001; I2 = 95%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.