Claims

The SCL model improves theoretical knowledge scores compared to LBL in medical education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? SCL significantly improves theoretical knowledge scores compared to LBL (MD 5.21, 95% CI 3.27–7.16). → Lou Jicheng 2025

Evidence

Lou Jicheng 2025

Lou Jicheng, Guo Feng. (2025). Comparing the seminar-case learning and lecture-based learning models in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07041-w

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 13 RCTs (814 students) using a random-effects model due to high heterogeneity (I² = 96%). Found SCL "associated with higher theoretical knowledge scores" compared to LBL, with a weighted mean difference of "MD 5.21".

"Compared with the LBL model, the SCL model was associated with higher theoretical knowledge scores (MD 5.21, 95% CI 3.27–7.16; p < 0.00001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.