In the main study, learning gains from pre-test to post-test were not directly influenced by the collaboration script, though all students improved significantly over time¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q2·i0–i2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i0 Absolute knowledge-test gains did not differ significantly between DDR and BRD groups (d = 0.08, p = .364). → Heimbuch 2018
q2 i2 A paired-samples t-test showed students in both groups improved from pre-test to post-test with a medium to large effect (d = 0.66, p < .001). → Heimbuch 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Heimbuch 2018¶
Heimbuch, S., Ollesch, L., & Bodemer, D. (2018). Comparing effects of two collaboration scripts on learning activities for wiki-based environments. University of Duisburg-Essen. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9283-0
q2 · i0 · causal · r2
Main-study Welch's t-test on learning gains (Table 7): BRD M = 0.91 vs DDR M = 1.04, t(63.94) = 0.35, p = .364, d = 0.08 [-0.39, 0.56]. No equivalence test was reported.
"Students in the DDR group performed minimally better in terms of absolute gains from the knowledge pre -test to the post -test, but the magnitude of the scripting effect was negligibly small and the statistics for this test were estimated with fairly low precision."
Heimbuch 2018 (2)¶
Heimbuch, S., Ollesch, L., & Bodemer, D. (2018). Comparing effects of two collaboration scripts on learning activities for wiki-based environments. University of Duisburg-Essen. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9283-0
q2 · i2 · causal · r1
Main-study paired-samples t-test across both script groups: pre-test M = 13.13 vs post-test M = 14.11, t(68) = 5.52, p < .001, d = 0.66 [0.40, 0.92], printed in Table 7.
"a paired samples t-Test clearly suggested that students in both groups showed a performance increase from the first knowledge test to the second knowledge test with a medium to large effect for the time of testing"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In the main study, BRD articles were longer, but DDR articles had a lower relative error rate, and article length correlated positively with errors
- In the main study, NCC, metacognitive strategies, and intrinsic motivation moderated contribution frequency but showed no significant conditional effects on learning gains — related
- In the main study, wiki contribution frequency indirectly mediated the effect of script on post-test learning, while the direct script effect was not significant — related
- In the main study, the DDR script induced far more talk-page discussion contributions and fewer article edits than the BRD script — related
- Learning with collaboration scripts outdoors yields biology knowledge gains in both iterations, with joint regulation activities mediating script-component effects — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
script-no-direct-effect-learning-gains |
title |
In the main study, learning gains from pre-test to post-test were not directly influenced by the collaboration script, though all students improved significantly over time |
description |
In the main study, learning gains from pre-test to post-test were not directly influenced by the collaboration script, though all students improved significantly over time |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — heimbuch-2018, heimbuch-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.