SDL is implemented through two main categories: theoretical (knowledge-focused) and practical (hands-on procedural) approaches¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The review identifies two main SDL categories — theoretical (tested via formative/summative assessments) and practical (hands-on procedures and skills) — with varied formats including case-based learning, problem-based learning, e-learning modules, and simulation. → Aulakh Jasmine 2025
Evidence¶
Aulakh Jasmine 2025¶
Aulakh Jasmine, Wahab Hana, Richards Christine, Bidaisee Satesh, Ramdass Prakash V. A. K. (2025). Self-directed learning versus traditional didactic learning in undergraduate medical education: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06449-0
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Descriptive taxonomy from the review's Results section: "two main categories of Self-Directed learning (SDL) were identified: [1] theoretical... and [2] practical", spanning formats such as case-based learning, e-learning modules, and simulation-based training.
"two main categories of Self-Directed learning (SDL) were identified: [1] theoretical, whereby students gained knowledge on various subjects and were then tested on formative and summative assessments; and [2] practical, whereby students engaged in hand-on experience by performing various procedures or exhibiting certain skills."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Curricular elements such as learning activities and opportunities are associated with improving the student learning experience in SDL — related
- Self-directed learning yields higher mean exam scores than traditional didactic learning in undergraduate medical education — related
- Across the reviewed studies, simulation-based interventions consistently improved paediatric undergraduate learning outcomes, including clinical reasoning, procedural skills and confidence — related
- Analysis of 52 higher-education assessment plans found outcome-based orientation dominant, with dynamic elements subsumed under summative scoring — related
- Formative assessment practices coherent with OpenSciEd are constrained by grading expectations misaligned with formative goals and by the time cost of evaluating and giving feedback on three-dimensional tasks. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.