Across the reviewed studies, simulation-based interventions consistently improved paediatric undergraduate learning outcomes, including clinical reasoning, procedural skills and confidence¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The review concludes that SBE interventions consistently improved outcomes across clinical performance, knowledge acquisition, technical skills, and affective domains, measured via OSCEs, pre-post tests, and validated questionnaires. → Eid Farida 2026
Evidence¶
Eid Farida 2026¶
Eid Farida, Maryum Rida, Waugh Lucy, Kilian Paddy, Atiomo William, Al-Hammadi Suleiman. (2026). Simulation-Based Education (SBE) in paediatric undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09730-6
q3 · i? · review · r2
The review's synthesis of Table 3 outcome data across the 30 studies, assessed via OSCEs, pre-post and retention tests, performance checklists, and validated questionnaires. It reports "simulation-based interventions consistently improved outcomes", with modality-specific advantages, though no statistical aggregation was performed.
"Despite these barriers, simulation-based interventions consistently improved outcomes. High-fidelity modalities enhanced clinical reasoning, leadership, and confidence in recognizing clinical severity [31, 33], while virtual reality proved effective for knowledge retention and skill acquisition [22, 27, 49]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The review reports that high-fidelity simulation outperformed case-based discussion for clinical reasoning and leadership in paediatric emergencies — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Virtual reality was particularly effective for procedural skill development and knowledge retention in paediatric undergraduate training — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- High-fidelity manikins and virtual reality were the most common paediatric SBE modalities across the reviewed studies — related
- Thirty empirical studies of paediatric simulation-based education in undergraduate medical education were identified, predominantly randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs — related
- Resource limitations, technical hurdles and time constraints were the primary reported barriers to implementing paediatric SBE — related
- Paediatric SBE research is geographically concentrated in high- and upper-middle-income regions, with no studies from the Middle East/North Africa region in the specified timeframe — related
- Telesimulation and remote-facilitated paediatric simulation achieved outcomes comparable to in-person training — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Skills outcomes mostly showed no between-role differences, with active participant advantages limited to delayed technical skills, non-technical affective outcomes, and role-continuity effects — related
- No included study measured critical thinking as an explicit outcome or compared simulation modalities directly — related
- Affective outcomes (satisfaction, confidence, engagement) are consistently positive across ADS modalities but rest predominantly on subjective, short-term measures — related
- Manikins show anatomical discrepancies against human imaging data, yet may still support effective skill acquisition, suggesting educational fidelity can matter more than anatomical replication — related
- Most digital teaching methods demonstrated positive effects on practical skills acquisition, particularly simulation-based, VR-supported or interactive formats, but effect magnitude and consistency varied substantially — a broader claim this one bears on
- Participant satisfaction with simulation-based leadership training was generally high, often above 90% — related
- Included studies reported improved comfort, confidence and empathy, but used no standardised outcome measures — related
- VR tools enhance acquisition and retention of clinical and procedural skills but face barriers including cybersickness, limited tactile feedback and variable long-term skill transfer — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- High-fidelity simulation particularly enhances core clinical competencies such as CPR, infection control, and diagnostic reasoning — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Active methodologies show no definitive superiority over traditional teaching in undergraduate dentistry — reports the opposite
- Providing clinical cases is the primary method to enhance students' clinical reasoning — related
- Very high majorities of students rated high-fidelity simulation as enhancing learning, clinical reasoning, decision-making, and value — related
- Feedback-oriented and interactive instructional methods are associated with improvements in clinical reasoning, procedural skills, and learner confidence in orthodontic postgraduate education — related
- SDL is implemented through two main categories: theoretical (knowledge-focused) and practical (hands-on procedural) approaches — related
- Across all modalities, training interventions improved either performance or safety outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- VR clinical simulation produced higher anxiety than face-to-face manikin simulation in maternal-newborn nursing — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.