Claims

The authors attribute the motivation decrease to researcher-selected applications limiting autonomy, low technological literacy undermining competence, and weak relatedness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Limiting students' choice of digital applications constrained the autonomy need and lowered motivation. → Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020

Evidence

Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol 2020

Nurhan Aktaş & Hayati Akyol. (2020). Effect of Digital Writing Workshop Activities on Writing Motivation and Development of Story Writing Skills. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.20

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' theoretical interpretation, drawing on self-determination theory, of why motivation fell: applications were determined by the researcher at each writing stage, students had difficulty with them, and no alternatives were offered.

"The fact that the digital applications were not chosen by the students limited the need for autonomy, which is important in terms of motivation. The situation led to a decrease in students’ motivation."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.