Claims

SDVT matches traditional learning for basic surgical tasks but underperforms for complex procedures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Three RCTs found SDVT comparable to TL for basic skills, while for advanced skills two RCTs found comparable outcomes and another favoured TL. → Morsund Lars Andreas Lars 2026

Evidence

Morsund Lars Andreas Lars 2026

Morsund Lars Andreas Lars, Singh Shraddha, Patel Agastya, Lancellotti Francesco, Satyadas Thomas. (2026). Computer-based surgical skill training: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08830-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

Synthesis of 15 SDVT studies (11 basic, 4 advanced); the review reports "Three RCTs found SDVT comparable to TL" for basic skills, with one RCT favouring TL.

"Three RCTs found SDVT comparable to TL [7, 11, 13], especially when instructor-led feedback was integrated. One RCT [26], however, favoured TL to be superior to SDVT."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.