Publication bias could not be ruled out in the pooled teacher-student SEC estimate, though the association persisted across sensitivity analyses¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q4
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i? Funnel plot asymmetry and the Egger test indicated publication bias could not be ruled out for the pooled teacher-student SEC correlation, but the positive association persisted across sensitivity analyses. → Nguyen 2026
Evidence¶
Nguyen 2026¶
Nguyen, T.-A., Hidajat, T., Zhou, T., Ma, T., Hoang, A., Poed, S., & Edwards, E. J. (2026). Relations between Teachers' and Students' Social-emotional Competence: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10218-4
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Publication-bias assessment used publication status as a moderator, funnel plot inspection with Egger's regression test for a three-level model, and Orwin's fail-safe N; sensitivity analyses re-estimated models excluding global SEC measures, ambiguous constructs, unpublished studies, methodologically limited studies, and outliers.
"The positive association between teachers' SEC and students' SEC persisted across sen -sitivity analyses. However, funnel plot asymmetry and the Egger test indicated that publication bias could not be ruled out, hence the magnitude of the pooled estimate should be interpreted with caution."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Funnel-plot asymmetry suggests possible selection or publication bias, but p-curve analyses indicate evidential value for the pooled relationships — related
- The pooled effect of writing instruction for US ELL students is robust to sensitivity analyses but funnel plot asymmetry suggests possible missing positive effect sizes — related
- Publication bias is present in the embodied vocabulary learning literature, suggesting pooled effects may overestimate the true benefit — related
- Publication bias evidence is mixed: marginal asymmetry for tutees but no missing studies, and no bias for tutors — related
- Teachers' SEC shows a moderate overall correlation with students' SEC across K-12 studies, with considerable between-study variability — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sec-pooled-estimate-publication-bias-caution |
title |
Publication bias could not be ruled out in the pooled teacher-student SEC estimate, though the association persisted across sensitivity analyses |
description |
Publication bias could not be ruled out in the pooled teacher-student SEC estimate, though the association persisted across sensitivity analyses |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nguyen-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.