Small systematic discrepancies imply SEDA growth estimates may not generalize to MAP Growth-based estimates in some states¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Small systematic discrepancies between SEDA and MAP Growth estimates imply SEDA growth estimates are less likely to generalize to MAP Growth estimates in some states. → Megan Kuhfeld 2019
Evidence¶
Megan Kuhfeld 2019¶
Megan Kuhfeld, Thurston Domina, Paul Hanselman. (2019). Validating the SEDA measures of district educational opportunities via a common assessment. AERA Open 5(2). https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/validating-the-seda-measures-of-district-educational-opportunities-via-a-common-assessment/ doi:10.1177/2332858419858324
q3 · i? · associational · r?
Boundary condition stated in the abstract of the validity study: despite high overall congruence, "small systematic discrepancies" limit generalization of SEDA growth estimates to MAP Growth-based estimates in some states. No effect size or state list is printed.
"However, small systematic discrepancies imply that the SEDA growth estimates are less likely to generalize to estimates obtained through MAP Growth in some states."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Discrepancies between SEDA and MAP Growth ELA growth estimates are slightly more pronounced in high-socioeconomic-status districts — related
- SEDA growth estimates show a high degree of congruence with MAP Growth-based estimates overall — related
- SEDA and MAP Growth district growth estimates in mathematics correlate at .90 (precision-adjusted) — related
- SEDA and MAP Growth district growth estimates in ELA correlate at .82 (precision-adjusted) — related
- Validation research via a common assessment supports SEDA achievement scores — related
- SEDA growth estimates show differences from common-assessment-based estimates — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
seda-growth-generalization-limited-some-states |
title |
Small systematic discrepancies imply SEDA growth estimates may not generalize to MAP Growth-based estimates in some states |
description |
Small systematic discrepancies imply SEDA growth estimates may not generalize to MAP Growth-based estimates in some states |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — megan-kuhfeld-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.