SEDA and MAP Growth district growth estimates in mathematics correlate at .90 (precision-adjusted)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Precision-adjusted correlations between SEDA and MAP Growth growth estimates in mathematics reach .90. → Megan Kuhfeld 2019
Evidence¶
Megan Kuhfeld 2019¶
Megan Kuhfeld, Thurston Domina, Paul Hanselman. (2019). Validating the SEDA measures of district educational opportunities via a common assessment. AERA Open 5(2). https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/validating-the-seda-measures-of-district-educational-opportunities-via-a-common-assessment/ doi:10.1177/2332858419858324
q3 · i? · associational · r?
Convergent validity analysis comparing SEDA district growth estimates against estimates derived from NWEA's MAP Growth assessments; the abstract reports "strong precision-adjusted correlations" of .90 in math. No effect size beyond the correlation is printed.
"We find strong precision-adjusted correlations between growth estimates from SEDA and MAP Growth in math (.90) and ELA (.82)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Discrepancies between SEDA and MAP Growth ELA growth estimates are slightly more pronounced in high-socioeconomic-status districts — related
- Small systematic discrepancies imply SEDA growth estimates may not generalize to MAP Growth-based estimates in some states — related
- SEDA and MAP Growth district growth estimates in ELA correlate at .82 (precision-adjusted) — related
- SEDA growth estimates show a high degree of congruence with MAP Growth-based estimates overall — a broader claim this one bears on
- Validation research via a common assessment supports SEDA achievement scores — related
- SEDA growth estimates show differences from common-assessment-based estimates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
seda-map-growth-math-growth-correlation-090 |
title |
SEDA and MAP Growth district growth estimates in mathematics correlate at .90 (precision-adjusted) |
description |
SEDA and MAP Growth district growth estimates in mathematics correlate at .90 (precision-adjusted) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — megan-kuhfeld-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.