Facilitators' questions, regularly posed in terms of seeing, make it relevant for students to discuss how situations appeared audiovisually and how these appearances contrasted with their experiences¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The design and sequential environment of facilitators' questions made it relevant for students to comment on appearances versus experiences. → Elin Johansson 2017

Evidence¶

Elin Johansson 2017¶

Elin Johansson, Oskar Lindwall, Hans Rystedt. (2017). Experiences, appearances, and interprofessional training: The instructional use of video in post-simulation debriefings. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9252-z

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Finding from the analysis of the 40 recorded debriefings: facilitator questions (e.g. 'Do you see something that works well here?') project responses based on what is visible in the clip rather than on first-person experience, contrasting appearances with "their experiences from the situation".

"The design and sequential environment of facilitators ' questions and comments made it relevant for the students to discuss how the displayed situations appeared audiovisually and how these appearances contrasted with their experiences from the situation."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In the debriefings, students who observed a scenario via live video join facilitators in attempts to reconceptualise the experiences expressed by scenario participants, using audiovisual appearances as a resource — related