Claims

Browsing term lists (selection mode) helps searchers who do not know the exact query term

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 1994 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Continuous scrolling through alphabetical term lists is valuable because users do not always know the exact query term or author name. → Epstein 1994

Evidence

Epstein 1994

Epstein, Jonathan A., Kans, Jonathan A., & Schuler, Gregory D. (1994). WWW Entrez: A Hypertext Retrieval Tool for Molecular Biology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED462262

q2 · i? · design · r2

The authors' ergonomic analysis of the Entrez interface reports, from experience, that "selection mode" scrolling of alphabetical term lists is valuable because "users don't always know the exact query term or author name". No effect size is reported.

"Experience shows that this scrolling ("selection mode") is a valuable feature of Entrez, since users don't always know the exact query term or author name."

Studies bearing on this claim

Do retrieval tools that help users who cannot state the exact query (term browsing, query expansion, result summaries) improve what they find? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 2 narrower claims that bear on it: 3 distinct studies (2 design, 1 causal), q2, 0 of 3 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Epstein 1994 q2 · design · r2 i? this claim
Sidney Shapiro and Joshua Lindemann 2026 q2 · design · r2 i? Post-deployment diagnostics attributed many remaining retrieval misses to query formulatio (supports)
Yifan Liu 2026 q2 · causal · r? i? AI overviews in an academic search engine showed mixed effects: summaries may reduce menta (qualifies)

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id selection-mode-browsing-helps-uncertain-searchers
title Browsing term lists (selection mode) helps searchers who do not know the exact query term
description Browsing term lists (selection mode) helps searchers who do not know the exact query term
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1994
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — epstein-1994

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.