Claims

Students' self-assessed knowledge of RCT evaluation improved from 36.67% to 80.00% after CASP-based instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-course self-assessed knowledge of RCT evaluation averaged 36.67 ± 10.29% and post-course 80.00 ± 9.70%, a significant enhancement (p < 0.0001). → Nawanopparatsakul 2024

Evidence

Nawanopparatsakul 2024

Nawanopparatsakul, S., Watana, S., Taesotikul, T., Phuagphong, P., & Chinpaisal, C. (2024). Development of Skills for Pharmacy Students in Evaluating Randomized Controlled Trials Using CASP Checklist. Proceedings of ICRES 2024 -- International Conference on Research in Education and Science. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED673088

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Student self-assessment exercises administered before and after instruction in the same single-group course, reported in Table 4 with "p-value < 0.0001"; the printed averages are 36.67 ± 10.29% and 80.00 ± 9.70%.

"Pre-course, most students exhibited limited knowledge in RCT evaluation, averaging 36.67 ± 10.29%. Post -course, self -assessment usi ng the CASP saw a remarkable improvement, averaging 80.00 ± 9.70%."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.