Collaborative group assignments for new drug evaluations using CASP achieved average scores above 80%¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After individual skill development, students' group tasks evaluating new medications averaged 86.61 ± 6.93%, with a maximum of 100 and minimum of 76.60. → Nawanopparatsakul 2024

Evidence¶

Nawanopparatsakul 2024¶

Nawanopparatsakul, S., Watana, S., Taesotikul, T., Phuagphong, P., & Chinpaisal, C. (2024). Development of Skills for Pharmacy Students in Evaluating Randomized Controlled Trials Using CASP Checklist. Proceedings of ICRES 2024 -- International Conference on Research in Education and Science. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED673088

q2 · i? · design · r2

Instructor-rubric evaluation of small-team group assignments in which students presented new medications of interest and their CASP assessments, reported in Table 3; the article prints the "average of 86.61 ± 6.93%" with no inferential test.

"Students attained a maximum score of 100%, with an average of 86.61 ± 6.93%. Evaluation of these new medication assignments revealed students' development of professional pharmaceutical evaluation skills in medication assessment post the course's teaching and learning process."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Instructor feedback on individual CASP-based RCT assignments significantly improved fifth-year pharmacy students' RCT evaluation scores — related
• Students' self-assessed knowledge of RCT evaluation improved from 36.67% to 80.00% after CASP-based instruction — related
• Students reported highest satisfaction with the feedback process in the CASP-based teaching format — related