Claims

Self-assessment accuracy and estimated performance change do not improve over repeated task selections within a single session

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Self-assessment accuracy remained -1 step for both early and final selections, with no significant difference between them, z = -0.91, p = .36. → Nugteren 2018 q2 i? Estimated performance change showed no significant difference between early and final selections, z = -1.19, p = .23. → Nugteren 2018 (2)

Evidence

Nugteren 2018

Nugteren, M. L., Jarodzka, H., Kester, L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018). Self-regulation of secondary school students: self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Wilcoxon signed-rank comparison of the first four versus final four task selections in the N = 15 experiment. Median accuracy was -1 step at both points; equivalence was not tested, only the non-significant difference is reported.

"There was no significant difference between the overall self-assessment accuracy scores for early and final selections, z =- 0.91, p = .36."

Nugteren 2018 (2)

Nugteren, M. L., Jarodzka, H., Kester, L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018). Self-regulation of secondary school students: self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Same split-half comparison for estimated performance change (JOL minus performance estimate), which was 0 steps for both early and final selections. No effect size is printed.

"There was no significant difference between early and final task selections for estimated performance change, z =- 1.19, p = .23."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-assessment-accuracy-no-improvement-over-time
title Self-assessment accuracy and estimated performance change do not improve over repeated task selections within a single session
description Self-assessment accuracy and estimated performance change do not improve over repeated task selections within a single session
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — nugteren-2018, nugteren-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.