Claims

Self-assessment has a significant positive effect on seventh-grade EFL students' writing competence compared with conventional teacher assessment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students taught writing with self-assessment scored significantly higher on writing competence tests of short functional, descriptive, and procedure texts than students taught with conventional assessment (F = 14.748, sig. 0.000). → Ratminingsih 2018 q3 i? The experimental group's mean writing competence score (82.85) was descriptively higher than the control group's (79.29). → Ratminingsih 2018 (2)

Evidence

Ratminingsih 2018

Ratminingsih, N. M., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Vigayanti, L. P. D. (2018). Self-Assessment: The Effect on Students’ Independence and Writing Competence. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11320a

q3 · i? · causal · r1

One-way ANOVA on writing competence tests (invitation, descriptive text, procedure text) in the same post-test-only control-group experiment. The article reports "the value of F = 14.748" with significance 0.000, supporting a significant effect of self-assessment on writing competence.

"The result of the calculation of One -Way ANOVA shows that the difference between students’ writing competence treated using self-assessment and conventional assessment has the value of F = 14.748 and the value of significance 0.000."

Ratminingsih 2018 (2)

Ratminingsih, N. M., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Vigayanti, L. P. D. (2018). Self-Assessment: The Effect on Students’ Independence and Writing Competence. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11320a

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics (Table 2) for the writing competence measure: the self-assessment group's mean of 82.85 is described as "higher than the mean score of those treated by convent ional assessment, that is 79.29". Descriptive means only; no effect size is printed.

"the mean score of the students’ writing competence taught by using self -assessment is 82.85, it is also higher than the mean score of those treated by convent ional assessment, that is 79.29"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.