Claims

Self-efficacy significantly predicted engagement and inversely predicted disengagement, and mediated adaptability's links to outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Self-efficacy significantly predicted participation (β = 0.20), aspirations (β = 0.73), and enjoyment (β = 0.45), and inversely predicted disengagement (β = −0.34). → Martin Andrew J. 2023 q3 i? Self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between perceived adaptability and engagement and disengagement. → Martin Andrew J. 2023 (2)

Evidence

Martin Andrew J. 2023

Martin Andrew J., Ginns Paul, Collie Rebecca J. (2023). University students in COVID-19 lockdown: The role of adaptability and fluid reasoning in supporting their academic motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101712

q3 · i2 · associational · r2

Fully-forward SEM paths from self-efficacy (MES-UC, 4 items) to all four outcomes, with standardized betas as printed, controlling for lockdown, adaptability, fluid reasoning, and background covariates. The participation path was "medium effect"; the others large.

"The model's mediator, self-efficacy, significantly predicted participation (β = 0.20, p = .05; medium effect), aspirations (β = 0.73, p ≤ .001; large effect), and enjoyment (β = 0.45, p ≤ .001; large effect)—and inversely predicted disengagement (β = −0.34, p ≤ .001; large effect)."

Martin Andrew J. 2023 (2)

Martin Andrew J., Ginns Paul, Collie Rebecca J. (2023). University students in COVID-19 lockdown: The role of adaptability and fluid reasoning in supporting their academic motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101712

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Auxiliary test of indirect paths using parametric bootstrapping, reported in the Results narrative with details in Supplementary Materials. The mediation from lockdown or fluid reasoning through self-efficacy was not reported as significant.

"self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between perceived adaptability and engagement and disengagement; and, moderation tests revealed a significant lockdown x fluid reasoning interaction effect for self-efficacy"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-efficacy-predicts-engagement-and-mediation
title Self-efficacy significantly predicted engagement and inversely predicted disengagement, and mediated adaptability's links to outcomes
description Self-efficacy significantly predicted engagement and inversely predicted disengagement, and mediated adaptability's links to outcomes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — martin-andrew-j-2023, martin-andrew-j-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.