Self-efficacy significantly predicted engagement and inversely predicted disengagement, and mediated adaptability's links to outcomes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Self-efficacy significantly predicted participation (β = 0.20), aspirations (β = 0.73), and enjoyment (β = 0.45), and inversely predicted disengagement (β = −0.34). → Martin Andrew J. 2023
q3 i? Self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between perceived adaptability and engagement and disengagement. → Martin Andrew J. 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Martin Andrew J. 2023¶
Martin Andrew J., Ginns Paul, Collie Rebecca J. (2023). University students in COVID-19 lockdown: The role of adaptability and fluid reasoning in supporting their academic motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101712
q3 · i2 · associational · r2
Fully-forward SEM paths from self-efficacy (MES-UC, 4 items) to all four outcomes, with standardized betas as printed, controlling for lockdown, adaptability, fluid reasoning, and background covariates. The participation path was "medium effect"; the others large.
"The model's mediator, self-efficacy, significantly predicted participation (β = 0.20, p = .05; medium effect), aspirations (β = 0.73, p ≤ .001; large effect), and enjoyment (β = 0.45, p ≤ .001; large effect)—and inversely predicted disengagement (β = −0.34, p ≤ .001; large effect)."
Martin Andrew J. 2023 (2)¶
Martin Andrew J., Ginns Paul, Collie Rebecca J. (2023). University students in COVID-19 lockdown: The role of adaptability and fluid reasoning in supporting their academic motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101712
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Auxiliary test of indirect paths using parametric bootstrapping, reported in the Results narrative with details in Supplementary Materials. The mediation from lockdown or fluid reasoning through self-efficacy was not reported as significant.
"self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between perceived adaptability and engagement and disengagement; and, moderation tests revealed a significant lockdown x fluid reasoning interaction effect for self-efficacy"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Perceived adaptability significantly and positively predicted self-efficacy and all three engagement dimensions — related
- Lockdown was significantly associated with higher disengagement (β = 0.12) but not with self-efficacy among university students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-efficacy-predicts-engagement-and-mediation |
title |
Self-efficacy significantly predicted engagement and inversely predicted disengagement, and mediated adaptability's links to outcomes |
description |
Self-efficacy significantly predicted engagement and inversely predicted disengagement, and mediated adaptability's links to outcomes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — martin-andrew-j-2023, martin-andrew-j-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.