Claims

Longitudinal partial strong measurement invariance of the four-item self-efficacy survey justifies fitting growth models to its scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Configural and weak invariance held; strong invariance showed a significant fit decrement traced to three threshold constraints, and the partial strong model (RMSEA = .02) was preferred. → Soland 2019

Evidence

Soland 2019

Soland, J. (2019). English Language Learners, Self-efficacy, and the Achievement Gap: Understanding the Relationship between Academic and Social-emotional Growth (The Collaborative for Student Growth at NWEA Working Paper). https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/english-language-learners-self-efficacy-and-the-achievement-gap-understanding-the-relationship-between-academic-and-social-emotional-growth/

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Longitudinal measurement invariance testing (Appendix C, Table A5) following Widaman, Ferrer, and Conger, with time periods as groups. Weak invariance constraints improved fit with non-significant LRTs; strong invariance produced a significant LRT decrement traced to three threshold constraints. No effect size is printed.

"Given the model fit was excellent for partial invariance (RMSEA = .02), the partial model became the preferred model for subsequent analyses. Ultimately, these results indicate that fitting a growth model to the self-efficacy scores is justifiable."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-efficacy-survey-partial-longitudinal-invariance
title Longitudinal partial strong measurement invariance of the four-item self-efficacy survey justifies fitting growth models to its scores
description Longitudinal partial strong measurement invariance of the four-item self-efficacy survey justifies fitting growth models to its scores
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
recheck_by 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — soland-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.