Claims

Generating own examples after instruction produced better retention and transfer than studying provided examples

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Self-generated examples yielded higher knowledge retention than provided examples (d = 0.51). → Krause-Wichmann 2025 q3 i2 Self-generated examples yielded higher knowledge transfer than provided examples (d = 0.66). → Krause-Wichmann 2025 (2)

Evidence

Krause-Wichmann 2025

Krause-Wichmann, T., Klopp, E., Stark, L., & Stark, R. (2025). Promoting future teachers' pedagogical knowledge: The role of self-generated vs. provided illustrative examples after instruction. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09694-4

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Planned contrast I-GE vs. I-PE on knowledge retention in the randomized three-condition experiment (N = 105); Table 3 prints d = 0.51 for this contrast, a medium effect favoring example generation.

"the contrasts revealed that the outcomes differed significantly between students who learned with self-generated examples (I-GE) and students who learned with provided examples (I-PE) with medium effect size. Students who generated examples achieved better results."

Krause-Wichmann 2025 (2)

Krause-Wichmann, T., Klopp, E., Stark, L., & Stark, R. (2025). Promoting future teachers' pedagogical knowledge: The role of self-generated vs. provided illustrative examples after instruction. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09694-4

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Planned contrasts on knowledge transfer in the same experiment; Table 3 prints d = 0.66 for I-GE/I-PE (and d = 1.17 for I-GE/I), and "Students who generated examples achieved the best results".

"Concerning knowledge transfer (KT), the contrasts indicated that the performance of students who learned with self-generated examples (I-GE) differed significantly from those who learned with provided examples (I-PE) and from those who restudied instruction only (I)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-generated-beat-provided-examples-retention-transfer
title Generating own examples after instruction produced better retention and transfer than studying provided examples
description Generating own examples after instruction produced better retention and transfer than studying provided examples
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — krause-wichmann-2025, krause-wichmann-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.