Generating own examples after instruction produced better retention and transfer than studying provided examples¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Self-generated examples yielded higher knowledge retention than provided examples (d = 0.51). → Krause-Wichmann 2025
q3 i2 Self-generated examples yielded higher knowledge transfer than provided examples (d = 0.66). → Krause-Wichmann 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Krause-Wichmann 2025¶
Krause-Wichmann, T., Klopp, E., Stark, L., & Stark, R. (2025). Promoting future teachers' pedagogical knowledge: The role of self-generated vs. provided illustrative examples after instruction. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09694-4
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Planned contrast I-GE vs. I-PE on knowledge retention in the randomized three-condition experiment (N = 105); Table 3 prints d = 0.51 for this contrast, a medium effect favoring example generation.
"the contrasts revealed that the outcomes differed significantly between students who learned with self-generated examples (I-GE) and students who learned with provided examples (I-PE) with medium effect size. Students who generated examples achieved better results."
Krause-Wichmann 2025 (2)¶
Krause-Wichmann, T., Klopp, E., Stark, L., & Stark, R. (2025). Promoting future teachers' pedagogical knowledge: The role of self-generated vs. provided illustrative examples after instruction. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09694-4
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Planned contrasts on knowledge transfer in the same experiment; Table 3 prints d = 0.66 for I-GE/I-PE (and d = 1.17 for I-GE/I), and "Students who generated examples achieved the best results".
"Concerning knowledge transfer (KT), the contrasts indicated that the performance of students who learned with self-generated examples (I-GE) differed significantly from those who learned with provided examples (I-PE) and from those who restudied instruction only (I)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Instruction followed by either self-generated or provided illustrative examples outperformed instruction only on knowledge retention and transfer in student teachers — related
- Perceived learning control enhanced transfer via knowledge retention only for students in the non-generative conditions (provided examples, instruction only), not for example generators — related
- Teacher students who generated their own examples after instruction achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, with text-only performing worst — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Instruction-only students perceived learning control comparably high to example generators, while provided-example students perceived lower control — related
- Quality of self-generated examples correlated with knowledge transfer and perceived learning control but not with knowledge retention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-generated-beat-provided-examples-retention-transfer |
title |
Generating own examples after instruction produced better retention and transfer than studying provided examples |
description |
Generating own examples after instruction produced better retention and transfer than studying provided examples |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — krause-wichmann-2025, krause-wichmann-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.