Claims

Teacher students who generated their own examples after instruction achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, with text-only performing worst

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Krause-Wichmann et al. (2025) found example-generation students reported higher learning control and better retention and transfer than given-examples students, while the text-only group performed worst; perceived control predicted retention and transfer for given-examples and text-only groups. → Katharina Loibl 2025

Evidence

Katharina Loibl 2025

Katharina Loibl, Valentina Nachtigall, Timo Leuders. (2025). Advances in research on composite instructional designs – investigating intermediate knowledge and preparation effects. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09751-6

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editorial reports, citing Krause-Wichmann et al. (2025), a study of teacher students learning educational theory who generated examples, received examples, or only engaged with the written text. Generating examples yielded better retention and transfer; no effect size is printed.

"Students who generated examples reported higher learning control and achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, while the text-only group performed worst."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-generated-examples-better-retention-transfer
title Teacher students who generated their own examples after instruction achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, with text-only performing worst
description Teacher students who generated their own examples after instruction achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, with text-only performing worst
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — katharina-loibl-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.