Teacher students who generated their own examples after instruction achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, with text-only performing worst¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Krause-Wichmann et al. (2025) found example-generation students reported higher learning control and better retention and transfer than given-examples students, while the text-only group performed worst; perceived control predicted retention and transfer for given-examples and text-only groups. → Katharina Loibl 2025
Evidence¶
Katharina Loibl 2025¶
Katharina Loibl, Valentina Nachtigall, Timo Leuders. (2025). Advances in research on composite instructional designs – investigating intermediate knowledge and preparation effects. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09751-6
q2 · i? · review · r2
The editorial reports, citing Krause-Wichmann et al. (2025), a study of teacher students learning educational theory who generated examples, received examples, or only engaged with the written text. Generating examples yielded better retention and transfer; no effect size is printed.
"Students who generated examples reported higher learning control and achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, while the text-only group performed worst."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Instruction-only students perceived learning control comparably high to example generators, while provided-example students perceived lower control — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Quality of self-generated examples correlated with knowledge transfer and perceived learning control but not with knowledge retention — related
- Instruction followed by either self-generated or provided illustrative examples outperformed instruction only on knowledge retention and transfer in student teachers — related
- Generating own examples after instruction produced better retention and transfer than studying provided examples — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Perceived learning control enhanced transfer via knowledge retention only for students in the non-generative conditions (provided examples, instruction only), not for example generators — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-generated-examples-better-retention-transfer |
title |
Teacher students who generated their own examples after instruction achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, with text-only performing worst |
description |
Teacher students who generated their own examples after instruction achieved better retention and transfer than those given examples, with text-only performing worst |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — katharina-loibl-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.