Self-regulated reading processes are positively associated with reading and learning outcomes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Effective self-regulated reading (strategy use, planning, monitoring) correlates with better reading outcomes and learning gains. → Hu 2017

Evidence¶

Hu 2017¶

Hu, Jingjing; Gao, Xuesong (Andy). (2017). Using think-aloud protocol in self-regulated reading research. Educational Research Review, v.22, pp. 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Barnett (1998), that self-regulated reading strategies were "positively correlated with reading outcomes" and effective self-regulators received the highest grades; similar patterns are reported for hypermedia learning studies (Azevedo et al.; Greene & Azevedo 2009).

"Barnett (1998) found self-regulated reading strategies, elaboration and monitoring positively correlated with reading outcomes and the students who effectively self-regulated in the reading process received the highest grades in the study."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

Self-Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Metacognitive Strategies Improve Learning — a broader claim this one bears on
Self-regulated learning improves achievement — a broader claim this one bears on
Strategy Instruction Improves Learning — a broader claim this one bears on
Self Regulated Learning Predicts Achievement — a broader claim this one bears on
Students' SRL profile under automated scoring was uneven, and only Execution-and-Monitoring was significantly associated with score gains — related
Strategy Instruction Improves Academic Performance — a broader claim this one bears on

Page metadata

Field	Value
`type`	`claim`
`id`	`self-regulated-reading-associated-with-outcomes`
`title`	`Self-regulated reading processes are positively associated with reading and learning outcomes`
`description`	`Self-regulated reading processes are positively associated with reading and learning outcomes`
`status`	`review`
`evidence_strength`	`moderate`
`newest_evidence`	`2017`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-10-21`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
`sources`	1 — `hu-2017`

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.