The selling (R2, unable but willing) category showed the highest performance impact among the intervention categories¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Among the four intervention categories, the selling group showed the highest performance impact, which the authors attribute to guidance and facilitation by the instructional leader. → Shaukat Ali Raza and Asma Sikandar 2018

Evidence¶

Shaukat Ali Raza and Asma Sikandar 2018¶

Shaukat Ali Raza and Asma Sikandar. (2018). Impact of Leadership Style of Teacher on the Performance of Students: An Application of Hersey and Blanchard Situational Model. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(3), 73-94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1209826

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Discussion of the style-split results for the 8 selling (R2) students, whose posttest mean of 37.00 exceeded their pretest mean of 28.00. The attribution to guidance and facilitation is the authors' interpretation, not a tested contrast.

"Interestingly, the highest performance impact is noticed in case of selling group reflecting the importance of guidance and facilitation provided by the instructional leader to this group"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in pretest and posttest performance across control and the four style categories — related
• Pretest-posttest gains were largest in the telling and selling (low-readiness) style categories compared with participating and delegating — related
• Matching teaching style to students' readiness level raised grade-8 science achievement relative to traditional teaching — a broader claim this one bears on
• Posttest achievement of the experimental group exceeded the control group except for delegating and telling, and delegating, participating and selling exceeded telling — related