Claims

Matching teaching style to students' readiness level raised grade-8 science achievement relative to traditional teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After a 10-week intervention applying Hersey and Blanchard styles by readiness level, the experimental group's posttest achievement (M = 37.25) was significantly higher than the control group's (M = 31.58). → Shaukat Ali Raza and Asma Sikandar 2018

Evidence

Shaukat Ali Raza and Asma Sikandar 2018

Shaukat Ali Raza and Asma Sikandar. (2018). Impact of Leadership Style of Teacher on the Performance of Students: An Application of Hersey and Blanchard Situational Model. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(3), 73-94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1209826

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest experiment: 40 experimental students taught General Science chapters 5-7 with readiness-matched styles for 10 weeks; 40 controls taught traditionally. Independent samples t-test gave t = -3.64, p = 0.00 at posttest; the article reports "a significant difference in mean scores". No effect size is printed.

"Whereas, a significant difference in mean scores of control group (31.58) and experimental group (37.25) is found i.e. the achievement scores of experimental group are better than those of contr ol group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.