Individual meta-analyses report SES–achievement correlations ranging from r = .12 to r = .41¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i2 First-order meta-analyses reviewed report SES–achievement effect sizes including r = .29 (Sirin), r = .22 (Harwell), r = .41 (Ciftci & Melis Cin), and r = .12–.18 (Kim et al., developing countries). → Tan 2024

Evidence¶

Tan 2024¶

Tan, C. Y. (2024). Socioeconomic Status and Student Learning: Insights from an Umbrella Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09929-3

q2 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Table 2 reports effect sizes from individual first-order meta-analyses, e.g., Sirin (2005) at "r = .29", Harwell et al. (2017) at r = .22, Ciftci & Melis Cin (2017) at d = 0.90 (equivalent to r = .41), and Kim et al. (2019) at r's = .12 and .18 for developing countries.

"SES was associated with student achievement at r = .29"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• SES is associated with student learning at a mean effect size of r = .22, deemed large with reference to educational benchmarks — a broader claim this one bears on