Claims

The experiment assessed communicative-skill formation across seven printed criteria with groups similar at assertion stage

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At the assertion stage, comparative analysis of the experimental and control groups on criteria including speech and language skills, linguistic memory, expressive reading, rhythm and intonation, creative writing, philological knowledge, and text interpretation found the two groups similar. → Akhmadullina et al. 2016

Evidence

Akhmadullina et al. 2016

R. M. Akhmadullina, A. R. Abdrafikova & N. V. Vanyukhina. (2016). The Use of Music as a Way of Formation of Communicative Skills of Students in Teaching English language. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(6), 1295-1302. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1114401

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Assertion-stage comparison of group A (22 students) and group B (24 students) on the article's listed criteria: "the formation of the basic speech and language skills", linguistic memory, expressive reading, rhythm and intonation, creative writing, philological knowledge, and interpretation of text. The article reports the groups were similar before the formation stage; no statistics are printed.

"Thus results in two groups were similar."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.