The experiment assessed communicative-skill formation across seven printed criteria with groups similar at assertion stage¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? At the assertion stage, comparative analysis of the experimental and control groups on criteria including speech and language skills, linguistic memory, expressive reading, rhythm and intonation, creative writing, philological knowledge, and text interpretation found the two groups similar. → Akhmadullina et al. 2016
Evidence¶
Akhmadullina et al. 2016¶
R. M. Akhmadullina, A. R. Abdrafikova & N. V. Vanyukhina. (2016). The Use of Music as a Way of Formation of Communicative Skills of Students in Teaching English language. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(6), 1295-1302. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1114401
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Assertion-stage comparison of group A (22 students) and group B (24 students) on the article's listed criteria: "the formation of the basic speech and language skills", linguistic memory, expressive reading, rhythm and intonation, creative writing, philological knowledge, and interpretation of text. The article reports the groups were similar before the formation stage; no statistics are printed.
"Thus results in two groups were similar."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Using music and musical information in English classes somewhat improved formation of communicative skills relative to traditional methods — related
- The experimental group showed increased motivation and improved communication skills after citation-based lessons, while the control group remained virtually unchanged — related
- Before the intervention, the AWT experimental group and the traditional-instruction control group showed no significant difference on any of the five writing-skill criteria — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.