Claims

Shared mental models show no significant link with perceived team effectiveness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? No significant relation was found between shared mental models and team performance as perceived by the team itself. → Van den Bossche 2011

Evidence

Van den Bossche 2011

Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Woltjer, G., & Kirschner, P. (2011). Team learning: building shared mental models. Instructional Science, 39, 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Regression of perceived team performance onto both shared mental model indicators found no significant link (shared concepts Beta = 0.28, n.s.; shared statements Beta = 0.16, n.s.); equivalence was not tested.

"No significant link is observable between the developed shared mental model and the team performance as perceived by the team itself; both for the indicator shared concepts (Beta = 0.28; n.s.) and for the indicator shared statements (Beta = 0.16; n.s.)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id shared-mental-models-not-linked-perceived-effectiveness
title Shared mental models show no significant link with perceived team effectiveness
description Shared mental models show no significant link with perceived team effectiveness
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-den-bossche-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.