Students become faster and more accurate in equation rearrangement over a short practice session even without feedback¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associationalr2·q3·i1–i3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Accuracy increased from the first to the second block (Block main effect, effect size η2 p = 0.015). → Susac A 2014
q3 i3 RTs decreased from the first to the second block (Block main effect, effect size η2 p = 0.489). → Susac A 2014 (2)
Evidence¶
Susac A 2014¶
Susac A, Bubic A, Vrbanc A and Planinic M (2014) Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00679
q3 · i1 · associational · r2
Two-way mixed-design ANOVA, Age × Block (first vs. second), on accuracy across the experiment's blocks; printed effect size η2 p = 0.015 for the Block main effect, a small effect.
"The results showed a statistically significant main effect of both factors, Age [F(3,327) = 8.37, p < 0.001, η2 p = 0.071] and Block [F(1,327) = 5.11, p < 0.05, η2 p = 0.015]"
Susac A 2014 (2)¶
Susac A, Bubic A, Vrbanc A and Planinic M (2014) Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00679
q3 · i3 · associational · r2
Same ANOVA design on RTs; printed effect size η2 p = 0.489 for the Block main effect, a large effect. "Participants of all ages became faster in equation solving in the second block," even those with stable high accuracy.
"η2 p = 0.099] and Block [F(1,326) = 312.27, p < 0.001, η2 p = 0.489], while the interaction was not significant [ F(3,326) = 2.58, p > 0.05, η2 p = 0.023]. Participants of all ages became faster in equation solving in the second block"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Algebraic Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Equations of the form a/x = b are the most difficult equation type, reflecting procedural complexity — related
- Students' difficulty rankings of equation types partly mismatch their measured performance, though metacognitive accuracy improves with age — related
- Accuracy and speed of simple equation rearrangement increase with students' age across grades 7–12 — related
- Alternating example-practice pairs produce faster and more accurate near-transfer solutions than blocked presentation of examples followed by practice — related
- During motor practice with knowledge of results, all groups reduced absolute error across blocks, and groups whose KR decision fell after the trial were more accurate during practice than groups whose decision fell before it, independent of choice. — related
- A second training session two days later further increases reasoning accuracy beyond the first session, though less strongly — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
short-practice-improves-equation-rearrangement |
title |
Students become faster and more accurate in equation rearrangement over a short practice session even without feedback |
description |
Students become faster and more accurate in equation rearrangement over a short practice session even without feedback |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — susac-a-2014, susac-a-2014-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.