Claims

Experimental-group students taught through short stories made statistically significant gains in both speaking and writing achievement from pretest to posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's speaking achievement rose significantly from pretest to posttest (mean difference 4.975). → Iman 2017 q2 i? The experimental group's writing achievement rose significantly from pretest to posttest (mean difference 4.500). → Iman 2017

Evidence

Iman 2017

Jaya Nur IMAN. (2017). A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON USING SHORT STORIES: STATISTICAL AND INFERENTIAL ANALYSES ON THE NON-ENGLISH MAJOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' SPEAKING AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENTS. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1719

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired sample t-test on the 20-student experimental group taught through short stories; speaking pretest mean 12.80 rose to 17.22. The article reports the Sig. value (2-tailed) was less than 0.05, so "the null hypotheses ( H01 and H02) were rejected"; no effect size is printed.

"the mean difference of speaking achievement between pre-test and post -test in experimental group was 4.975 with the standard deviation was 1.3810"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.