Shrinkage does not change accountability consequences for teachers of hard-to-predict students, since extreme-rating probabilities are unaffected¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? As a result of the null effect on extreme ratings, shrinkage does not alter the consequences that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive in the accountability system. → Herrmann 2013
Evidence¶
Herrmann 2013¶
Herrmann, M., Walsh, E., Isenberg, E., & Resch, A. (2013). Shrinkage of Value-Added Estimates and Characteristics of Students with Hard-to-Predict Achievement Levels. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/shrinkage-of-valueadded-estimates-and-characteristics-of-students-with-hardtopredict-achievement-levels
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The paper links its null finding on extreme value-added ratings to accountability outcomes, stating that teachers receiving estimates in the extremes of the distribution would, "as a result, receive consequences in the accountability system." The abstract reports no separate test of consequence probabilities.
"and, as a result, receive consequences in the accountability system."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers of students with hard-to-predict achievement levels tend to have less precise value-added estimates than teachers of other students — related
- Empirical Bayes shrinkage increases the precision of value-added estimates and reduces their absolute value for teachers of hard-to-predict students — related
- Shrinkage has no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive extreme value-added ratings — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Shrinkage had no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students received consequences — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Shrinkage could differentially affect consequences for teachers of fewer students or students with hard-to-predict achievement — related
- Teachers of students with low prior achievement and who receive free lunch tend to have less precise value-added estimates — related
- Empirical Bayes shrinkage could be used to address bias in proxy pre-test value-added estimates — related
- Findings on the distribution of highest-performing teachers are robust to omitting empirical Bayes shrinkage of the value-added estimates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
shrinkage-leaves-accountability-consequences-unchanged |
title |
Shrinkage does not change accountability consequences for teachers of hard-to-predict students, since extreme-rating probabilities are unaffected |
description |
Shrinkage does not change accountability consequences for teachers of hard-to-predict students, since extreme-rating probabilities are unaffected |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
recheck_by |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — herrmann-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.