Shrinkage has no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive extreme value-added ratings¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Shrinkage has no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive value-added estimates in the extremes of the distribution. → Herrmann 2013
Evidence¶
Herrmann 2013¶
Herrmann, M., Walsh, E., Isenberg, E., & Resch, A. (2013). Shrinkage of Value-Added Estimates and Characteristics of Students with Hard-to-Predict Achievement Levels. Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/shrinkage-of-valueadded-estimates-and-characteristics-of-students-with-hardtopredict-achievement-levels
q2 · i? · causal · r?
The paper reports a null finding: shrinkage has "no statistically significant effect on the relative probability" that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive extreme value-added estimates. No effect size or test statistic is printed in the available text; equivalence was not tested.
"this paper found shrinkage has no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive value-added estimates that fall in the extremes of the value-added distribution"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers of students with hard-to-predict achievement levels tend to have less precise value-added estimates than teachers of other students — related
- Empirical Bayes shrinkage increases the precision of value-added estimates and reduces their absolute value for teachers of hard-to-predict students — related
- Shrinkage does not change accountability consequences for teachers of hard-to-predict students, since extreme-rating probabilities are unaffected — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Shrinkage had no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students received consequences — related
- Shrinkage could differentially affect consequences for teachers of fewer students or students with hard-to-predict achievement — related
- Empirical Bayes shrinkage could be used to address bias in proxy pre-test value-added estimates — related
- Findings on the distribution of highest-performing teachers are robust to omitting empirical Bayes shrinkage of the value-added estimates — related
- The paper compares the reliability of value-added measures of teacher performance with standards for evaluations in other fields — related
- Teachers of students with low prior achievement and who receive free lunch tend to have less precise value-added estimates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
shrinkage-no-significant-effect-extreme-ratings |
title |
Shrinkage has no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive extreme value-added ratings |
description |
Shrinkage has no statistically significant effect on the relative probability that teachers of hard-to-predict students receive extreme value-added ratings |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — herrmann-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.