Iranian undergraduate EFL students who performed sight translation exercises during reading instruction scored significantly differently on a TOLIMO reading posttest than control students, which the author interprets as the experimental group outperforming the control group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After eleven sessions of treatment, an Independent Samples T-test found a significant difference between the posttest reading scores of the experimental and control groups (Sig. 0.040). → Fatollahi 2016
q2 i? The author states the experimental group's mean posttest reading ability was significantly higher than the control group's, although the printed posttest means show the control group higher (32.29 vs 25.14). → Fatollahi 2016
Evidence¶
Fatollahi 2016¶
Moslem Fatollahi. (2016). Applying Sight Translation as a Means to Enhance Reading Ability of Iranian EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p153
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental posttest comparison of two intact classes (N = 35 each) after eleven treatment sessions, analyzed with an Independent Samples T-test in SPSS 22; the printed Sig(2-tailed) is 0.040. The article reports "a significant difference between the reading scores of the two groups".
"result of the critical T-test score for equality of means is 0.04 which does not approve the null hypothesis of the posttest at a 0.05 level of confidence. In other words, as the first null hypothesis of this study is not approved, it is revealed that there is a significant difference between the reading scores of the two groups."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Genre-based reading instruction produces significantly higher reading posttest scores than traditional instruction for Iranian female high school EFL learners — related
- Portfolio-based instruction improves EFL learners' reading comprehension scores relative to non-portfolio instruction — related
- Iranian intermediate EFL learners taught through dynamic assessment outperformed a non-dynamically taught control group on a reading comprehension post-test — related
- Iranian intermediate EFL learners taught reading with CALL software scored significantly higher on reading comprehension than learners taught the same texts from printed pages — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.