Sign enhancement predicts high school language in opposite directions at elementary versus adolescent measurement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Early sign enhancement positively predicted CI-HS language after controlling early language, but sign enhancement measured in adolescence negatively predicted language outcomes. → Geers Ann E. 2011
Evidence¶
Geers Ann E. 2011¶
Geers Ann E., Sedey Allison L. (2011). Language and Verbal Reasoning Skills in Adolescents with 10 or More Years of Cochlear Implant Experience. Ear and Hearing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157037/
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Authors' interpretation in the Discussion of the regression findings: early sign enhancement (β = −0.181, p = .003 in Table 4 step 3) was positive once early language was controlled, whereas CI-HS sign enhancement (β = −.345, p <.001 in Table 5 step 1) was negative. The authors attribute the reversal to children with early sign enhancement having more room for improvement.
"Students with early sign enhancement exhibited higher CI-HS language scores after variance due to CI-E language was controlled. This means that signing children made greater language gains between the CI-E and CI-HS test sessions."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Access — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Early elementary characteristics predict 71% of variance in high school language outcomes of CI users — related
- Current adolescent characteristics including digit span, sentence duration and sign enhancement predict high school language outcomes — related
- Shorter duration of deafness, higher performance IQ, and lack of sign enhancement predict higher literacy in adolescents with cochlear implants — related
- Phonological processing skills account for 38.3% of variance in adolescent literacy after controlling for child, family, and implant characteristics — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sign-enhancement-direction-reversal |
title |
Sign enhancement predicts high school language in opposite directions at elementary versus adolescent measurement |
description |
Sign enhancement predicts high school language in opposite directions at elementary versus adolescent measurement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — geers-ann-e-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.